Oh come on... I meant fake names like john miller I think it is a
stupid solution as well, but I just thought of something to leave a
backdoor open for paranoid developers.
And I didn't meant
(snip) which doesn't have to be a bad thing...
because that sounds as I think this way, which I don't..
I could formulate the above better in this way: "which is not a bad
thing"
that suits it better
regards
Philip Stark
Am 14.03.2006 um 13:53 schrieb Stephan Seitz:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 08:21:25PM +0100, Philip Stark wrote:
2. Come back with a fake name... it's more your way, as you are
still anonymous but at least, you've got a real-sounding name
(probably the most suitable in this case)
That's why I think, that all patches should be signed with PGP/
GnuPG or X.509 certificates. And those keys should be signed by
trusted CA authorities like CAcert.org or such (identity check
against official documents, not only valid mail address).
3. Come back with your Real name... it means obeying the rules,
which doesn't have to be a bad thing...
Of course not, I mean, who would take a software seriously with
credit contents like:
Ford Prefect <mail>
Goldfish <mail>
Looks like script kiddie software, crack software or something else.
Imagine movie credits with such lines.
Of course you can have a nickname, and of course you can add it to
the CREDITS file:
Marc "Goldfish" Miller <mail>
Such things you can see in serious credits (movies, games).
Shade and sweet water!
Stephan
--
| Stephan Seitz E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/pgp.html |
