I agree. Why not release a Beta version or something like that? Let's not be too driven purely by deadlines here. That is how we got Windows ME.
A beta release now, followed by another week or so of bugfixing seems certainly reasonable. Just my $0.02 Steve On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 18:08 +0100, gl wrote: > I second the > idea that if you need to release something it should be tagged as > 'pre-release' / '2.9b' or similar.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
