Re: 3.0 release announcement

[Paul Louden]

Well we still have until the 29th either way. What we need right now I think is input on which bugs both in the tracker and at http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/SoftwareCodecPlayback are "Release Critical" and then say "We release when those are resolved, and no new critical ones have been added (or those that have are removed)" in my opinion. I personally am alright with pushing it back, but there needs to be a declared point at which it will be released, and in my opinion that could best be handled by defining what IS release critical. A reevaluation of what was originally defined.

On 5/15/06, Steve Moskovchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I agree.
Why not release a Beta version or something like that? Let's not be too
driven purely by deadlines here. That is how we got Windows ME.

A beta release now, followed by another week or so of bugfixing seems
certainly reasonable.

Just my $0.02
Steve

On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 18:08 +0100, gl wrote:
> I second the
> idea that if you need to release something it should be tagged as
> 'pre-release' / ' 2.9b' or similar.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBEaLdLaqFovyB8QhARAnL6AJ4nRfDSAYqcF4YAgFai0a3AJgqmzACeMZ48
aHrqjFIQNPITGYPUyXzfbko=
=ZLBk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----