On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Thomas Martitz<[email protected]> wrote: > Dominik Riebeling schrieb: >> On 7/9/09, Thomas Martitz <[email protected]> wrote: >>> The main blocker is the fact that rbutil is still a 1-binary app, >>> statically linking Qt stuff. IIRC that's a no-go for packaging. >> This is completely nonsense. Please don't state such things if you >> don't know about it. > Calm down. I'm sorry if I wasn't clear. I was meaning that debian/ubuntu > package people don't like static binaries.
Well, you didn't write "IIRC" or the lengthy version "if I remember correctly" or something like that, so your statement tells that the blocker *is* static linking of Qt. This is completely nonsense, and I won't "calm down" here: you're stating wrong facts. If you aren't sure about what you are stating make sure to *make clear* that you aren't 100% sure about it. Everything else *will* cause confusion, and as we already could see it *did* cause confusion. Nothing that's helpful or good. If you now tell that you weren't clear (may I laugh about that?) I could even get upset and tell you are stating wrong facts on purpose. But I won't do that, I have no proof for this nor any reason to think that could be the case. Still, stating wrong things and later telling your statements were unclear which were written in a form that implies them being 100% correct and now playing it down is at least something I consider *at least* really bad style. If you don't know about it why don't you just let the people actually working on the topic answer the question? - Dominik
