Al Le wrote:
On 17.08.2009 19:40, Jeff Goode wrote:
Al Le wrote:
why not have a large enough buffer that would be used by all DSP
effects?
Most DSP functions get along well enough without having their input
buffered anyway, so it wouldn't come up very often.
Ah, so this DSP effect is the only requiring a large buffer? Then OK.
But wait... What about time stretch? I think it also uses some kind of
buffer.
That I don't know. Time stretch was being developed concurrently so it
might have come up with its own solution. It could also be a buffer for
a different purpose incompatible with a lookahead buffer.
