Jonas Häggqvist wrote: > > On 06-06-2010 23:26, Edgar Toernig wrote: > > > > 2) My theme has 3 WPS variants: theme is Ticker.cfg, > > uses Ticker-C.wps as a default but there are also > > Ticker-A.wps and Ticker-B.wps that the user can > > select. > > The verifier gets totally confused by that. > > This should be 3 themes, so the user can see and download the one he > wants. There will be some duplication if he installs all 3, but I think > this is preferable.
Hmm, if that's what you want ... > > 3) Theme selects the classic statusbar. Verifier > > complains about "classic_statusbar.sbs" is missing. > > Afaict, it's part of he regular rockbox install. > > This should be fixed. > > Question to figure out who's to blame: Is it checkwps complaining about > this, or the theme site? The theme site. Don't know what checkwps says. > > 4) One of the WPSs uses 10-Nimbus.fnt. Verifier > > complains that it's part of the regular font set. > > It's not. > > It is. Maybe the error message is confusing (I don't remember), but > 10-Nimbus.fnt is indeed included in the font pack, and so we don't want > themes containing copies of it (which could lead to overwriting a fixed > version in the font pack with an outdated version from a theme). > > If the error message is not clear, it should be fixed. Just checked, you are right, it mentions the font pack. Sorry for the confusion. So, should I rename it to i.e. 10-Ticker.fnt? As I understand your reasoning, leaving it out would be a bad choice IMHO. If the user doesn't have the font and tries to load the theme he gets the default theme without any indication what went wrong. I would have to explain in the description on the theme site which font he has to install to make the theme load, where to get it, etc. Btw, I would prefer a theme pack (with all required fonts of course) over a font pack ;-) Ciao, ET.
