On 2 November 2010 08:56, Thomas Martitz <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 01.11.2010 22:42, schrieb Jonathan Gordon: > >> RaaA is not the only touchscreen target, > > But your mail and mine before was about reverting on RaaA. Why argue with > the Ondas now? > I maintain that there's nothing to fix on RaaA. So why would you want to > revert it for RaaA too?
I said it should be definitely reverted for the onda and should be reverted on raaa too. > My admission was that that changing the default possibly gets the stone > rolling, not doing nothing. And that doing nothing changes nothing. You > somehow mixed that up. > > There are no regressions on unusable targets. changing the default causes the onda to get into a state where it is impossible to get out of, that is FACT. that also means you intentionally broke it. The fact that it happens to be unusable is irrelevant. > > Speaking of my admission: >> >> Reverting android also gives you more motivation to fix it instead of >> being lazy > > As I noted in my above and opening mail: I think the opposite is the case > (assuming there was anything to fix on android/RaaA, which isn't the case). > > Best regards. > It should be reverted on both targets, that will give you the motivation to fix it properly on all touchscreen targets and not rely on per target #defines to set the correct default. Amazingly I have absolutly no faith that you will fix onda if it is left in this state. You want this change, you broke onda, it is your responsibility to fix it.
