On 11/1/2010 7:43 PM, Jonathan Gordon wrote:
On 2 November 2010 10:17, David Hall<dmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
Not pointing fingers, but this discussion has strayed from an argument of
the merits to some personal attacks.
Perhaps a gentlemanly agreement amongst participants to not discuss this for
24 hours? The world won't end in that time.
If discussion ends without it being reverted then that sets precedence
for anyone to later on (knowingly) break targets they don't own and
ignore consensus when there is one.
Where did I ask to end the discussion?
I asked to _pause_ the discussion in hopes cooler heads would prevail.
