On Aug 29, 2011 6:24 PM, "Johannes Linke" <[email protected]> wrote:
> As users will need Settings way more often than System, it seems absurd to give System a higher priority and move Settings one level down. Did you actually look at the proposed layouts? No one is suggesting both System *and* Setting be top level menu items, I think maybe you've confused yourself or allowed others to do so. System and Settings will be *merged*, so that basically all the items from Settings will go to the System menu (either under the sub-menu of Settings, or directly under the System menu entry), and there will no longer be a top level Settings entry. Go back to the first mail from this thread and review the proposed layout(s). [Saint]
