Bah! I misread your mail.
Apologies. On Aug 29, 2011 6:35 PM, "Hayden Pearce" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Aug 29, 2011 6:24 PM, "Johannes Linke" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> As users will need Settings way more often than System, it seems absurd to > give System a higher priority and move Settings one level down. > > Did you actually look at the proposed layouts? > No one is suggesting both System *and* Setting be top level menu items, I > think maybe you've confused yourself or allowed others to do so. > > System and Settings will be *merged*, so that basically all the items from > Settings will go to the System menu (either under the sub-menu of Settings, > or directly under the System menu entry), and there will no longer be a top > level Settings entry. > > Go back to the first mail from this thread and review the proposed > layout(s). > > [Saint]
