Am So, 25.09.2011, 16:54 schrieb Thomas Martitz: > Hello, > > I want to discuss that commit as I disagree with it in some ways, > perhaps even see it reverted. > > Clearly it introduced a user configurable skin buffer. That is something > we discussed many times before with no clear outcome. In fact, in my > memory there was a general opposition. I feel it silently introduced a > NoDo, although the wiki page doesn't list it. > So I'm bitter that this is introduced via a drive-by commit with no > mention about it at all. This is not the policy I want to see for > controversial changes.
Does anyone want to comment on this one? User configurable buffer sizes were questionable/controversial in the past (if not to avoid generally). Which is more easy than ever with buflib. I'm surprised nobody has an opinion on this now. TBH, I would like to revert this commit. Best regards.
