I've put up some notes on how I think the release system could work so that it's somewhere more static than just buried in all this email.
http://www.rollerweblogger.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=RollerReleasePlan Personally, I think this plan should work well for Roller and at the very least I think it's worth trying out. -- Allen On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 12:36, Lance Lavandowska wrote: > I echo Matt's comments. While I personally feel monthly might be too > aggressive, you two are going to be feeling the heat (in the kitchen), > so in the end it's your decision to make. > > Lance > > On 8/9/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dave and Allen, > > > > You guys are obviously biased in your votes here - primarily because > > Roller is your job and you've been mandated to schedule the releases > > to more fit their work schedule. I don't blame you. > > > > You guys are contributing the most code, and handling all release > > aspects - so I believe the decision is up to you. I'm in favor of > > whatever you guys advocate. If you are going to go through with this, > > it'd be nice to see a release schedule so we know when it's best to > > commit code. I'd like to integrate Acegi this week or next, but if > > there's a release coming out soon, I should probably wait. > > > > Matt
