On 9/29/05, Dave Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 29, 2005, at 5:00 PM, Elias Torres wrote:
> > Excellent research Dave. I'm really struggling to believe that people
> > make good use of hierarchies when it comes to categories. I hate
> > taxonomies for that matter too (I know I'll regret saying this). Did
> > you guys get a big push to add hierarchies by the community?
>
> No we really didn't. I saw hierarchies in Bloxsom and Blojsom plus I
> saw hierarchical categories as a way create separate blogs within one
> blog. For example, my main blog would be under category /blog/* and my
> linkblog would be under /linkblog/*. I actually had that working, then
> we ran into problems with my Hibernate/Castor query-wrappers, we ported
> from HSQL queries to Hibernate Query API and we lost recursive queries.
>   I think there is a patch in JIRA to restore recursive queries. I'd
> like to see them back in Roller because without recursion, hierarchical
> cats are almost useless.
>
>
> >> Is hierarchy the fundamental difference between categories and tags?
> >> What can you do with tags that Roller categories don't allow? Assign
> >> multiple tags to each blog entry. Create new tags on the fly. Easily
> >> query for tags across multiple blogs. We could modify Roller
> >> categories
> >> to allow those things and be more like tags.
> >>
> >> So far I see three options:
> >> 1) Complete categories by allowing multiple and add tags too
> >> 2) Replace existing category (and bookmark folder) code with tags
> >> 3) Refactor and rework existing category system so that it acts like
> >> tags
> >
> > 3) sounds a lot like 2) as I understand it. Refactoring would mean you
> > don't need to have categories created before using them (meaning tags)
> > and that would also mean removing the hierarchical nature of
> > categories, so in the end we would just have tags as 2).
> >
> > Before choosing between 1 and 2 I'd like to get your opinion if this
> > has a chance of being included in 2.0.
>
> I think it's too late for 2.0.
>
> Elias: how many of your users are using multiple categories?

368 users are using multiple categories and ~14% or better yet 3188
out of 21807 (all of these use at least one category, there are more
but w/o categories).

>
> - Dave
>
>

Reply via email to