+1 for release. Unfortunately, I won't have time to test it. Matt
On 12/8/05, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > that sounds good to me. since we are doing this we should probably also > include a fix for the error reported when using oracle. > > -- Allen > > > Dave Johnson wrote: > > > I just uploaded Roller 2.0.1 RC1 to my personal space on > > people.apache.org. > > > > *** Why do we need to release 2.0.1? > > > > The database upgrade scripts and start-up code did not work properly > > for those upgrading from PostgreSQL. > > > > *** What is Roller 2.0.1? > > > > A bug fix release of Roller 2.0 for those upgrading PostgreSQL based > > Roller systems. > > Upgrading PostgreSQL users should download this release instead of > > Roller 2.0. > > > > The release was built from roller/branches/roller_2.0 rev 355352 > > Changes were made to the 130-to-200 migration script and the > > UpgradeDatabase class which was using syntax incompatible with > > PostgreSQL. > > > > I've tested the upgrade scripts and code with MySQL and PostgreSQL and > > I've given a copy of the build to the fellow who reported the problem > > so that he can verify the fix. > > > > Additional testing would be very nice. > > > > > > - Dave > > >
