On 1/18/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have to disagree. Only complaint I've seen from the board is when the > report lacks information; not over the style of bullet-point vs prose. > If you check db.apache.org's report out this month, it's entirely > bulletpoint.
I didn't mean to imply that the bullet format was a problem. But, as a matter of fact, board members have complained about other status reports that I myself have written that focused too much on project metrics. One of our core beliefs is that great communities create great software. Aside from IP issues, what the board wants to know most of all is whether the community is healthy. If the community is healthy, we believe the project metrics will follow as a matter of course. -Ted. > > You did add some valuable information in your rewrite though and so > everyone knows, it was included in a repeat posting by Noel to the > board along with a couple of laggard reports. So the good one did get > through. > > Hen >
