1. "atrocious performance problems".
Not really quite sure what you're referring to there. You can always consult
the independent benchmark PolePosition (available in the JPOX docs) that
clearly shows JPOX **outperforming** Hibernate on virtually all tests. JPOX
completes the test suite in a *sixth* of the time that Hibernate needs. I'm
sorry if that's considered atrocious to you. Just wait til we get the time to
really optimise its performance.
2. "JDO is dead". Heard it all before. There are many people wanting JDO since
it gives things that "Java Persistence 1.0" doesnt. Datastore agnostic.
Provides more complete O/R mapping.
3. Yes, JPOX does have "Java Persistence 1.0" on the roadmap. That means what
it says it means. The plan is to provide that interface for people who want to
use it. JDO2 is a superset of Java Persistence 1.0 after all.
4. You've never been seen or heard from on the JPOX forum so perhaps if you
have issues about a piece of software you could actually consult the people who
support its use rather than coming out with this rather uneducated viewpoint in
a blog that the developers of that software are hardly likely to see unless
they just happen to come across it in a web trawl.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/roller-%2B-jdo-jpox-t996892c12275.html#a2635688
Sent from the Roller - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
