Allen, I already voted +1, but I just noticed sources being combined in, and
I had a couple of comments/questions.
(1) You might want to consider calling the top of the source tree something
other than "src", maybe "sources" because I think we expect it to look like
the top of the roller source tree does in SVN which itself contains several
directories and files (e.g. "web", "tools", build.xml) as well as the actual
"src" directory below it.
(2) I hope there will be a source distribution that does not include the
binary(?)
(3) Do we plan to include the (distributable) libraries that are under the
"tools" in such combined packages?
--a.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 5:09 AM
Subject: Re: Proposal: New distribution layout
+1
On 8/16/06, Elias Torres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Allen Gilliland wrote:
> we talked about this a while back and I've just now got around to
> pulling this into an actual proposal ...
>
> http://rollerweblogger.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=Proposal_DistributionLayout
>
> nothing fancy right now, basically just setting up the distribution so
> that the download isn't just the webapp.
>
> -- Allen
>
