Thanks Dave.

-Elias

Dave Johnson wrote:
> FYI: The apache-release target checks for JDK 1.4.2 before allowing a
> release build to proceed.
> 
> - Dave
> 
> 
> 
> On 8/31/06, Anil Gangolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> No problem.  I have fixed and committed the trivial change to address
>> this.
>> I'm just suggesting that to avoid this in the future you probably want to
>> set your dev env up to use a JDK 1.4.2 compiler for Roller.
>>
>> Here's the diff URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=438815&view=rev
>>
>> You can mail to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> for an automated help response on subscribing, etc. to the commits list.
>>
>>
>> --a.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Elias Torres" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 6:50 AM
>> Subject: Re: Roller 3.0 branch build broken?
>>
>>
>> > Definitely my bad. Did you fix or would you like me to fix?
>> >
>> > I'm not subscribed to roller-commits. Anybody can perform that magic?
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > -Elias
>> >
>> > Anil Gangolli wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I'm seeing this:
>> >>
>> >> javac
>> >>
>> >> C:\IdeaProjects\roller-svn\roller\branches\roller_3.0\build.xml:331:
>> >> Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details.
>> >>
>> C:\IdeaProjects\roller-svn\roller\branches\roller_3.0\src\org\apache\roller\ui\core\security\CustomUserRegistry.java
>>
>> >> (95:7)setEnabled(java.lang.Boolean) in
>> org.apache.roller.pojos.UserData
>> >> cannot be applied to (boolean)
>> >>
>> C:\IdeaProjects\roller-svn\roller\branches\roller_3.0\src\org\apache\roller\ui\core\security\CustomUserRegistry.java:95:
>>
>> >> setEnabled(java.lang.Boolean) in org.apache.roller.pojos.UserData
>> cannot
>> >> be applied to (boolean)
>> >> C:\IdeaProjects\roller-svn\roller\branches\roller_3.0\build.xml:331:
>> >> Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details.
>> >> C:\IdeaProjects\roller-svn\roller\branches\roller_3.0\build.xml:331:
>> >> Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I plan to fix this right now.
>> >>
>> >> However, it suggests that one of the committers (Elias? perhaps?)
>> has a
>> >> dev environment setup with JDK 1.5 as the build compiler,
>> >> where autoboxing would accept this.  Committers' should be building
>> with
>> >> 1.4.2 at least to verify things do build under 1.4.2.
>> >>
>> >> --a.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
> 

Reply via email to