On 9/13/06, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That sounds right to me, but I think branches/roller_2.x makes more sense. It's just a matter of convention, but I think that 2.x suggests that it's the ongoing branch for 2.x development, if there is any.
Yes, 2.x is better.
We should probably have a little bit of discussion about what we want for the standard way of trunk -> branch -> tag process. I don't think we have followed any strict conventions up until now, and it would be nice to actually do that.
This is the standing plan: http://rollerweblogger.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=RollerReleasePlan
I suggest the repository is used like this ...
+1 on everything you said, but I'm not so opposed to temporary tags as long as they are cleaned up when no longer needed. - Dave
