Dave wrote: > On 11/27/06, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...[snip]... > Yeah, I don't like one-offs either. My preference is to use the > shortest varchar within reason. Unfortunately, thanks to MySQL 4.X, > that 255. Fortunately, as you point out, that's well within reason > considering our current category usage. > > - Dave > I guess that as long as we stick to varchars we can also leave that up to the installer to decide the needs of their site as a last resource. -Elias
