Also, *IF* I remember right, and I'm not absolutely certain on this, if you change any of the code even say.. 95%? You still have to keep ROM credits. It's really not that big of a deal. Just add to the credits on the front with your own. (or code from scratch) Where things get sticky is if you want to release the code as it's own, in it own right. If you change 98% of the code, and you want to release it as StringBean 1.0, again *IF* I remember right, you still have to keep ROM as the credits because you didn't start from scratch, you used ROM as a base, even if the 2% is all that's left. I'd ask someone more informed on this than myself.
IMO, it's really not that big of a deal to give credit where it's due. I say this happily since I have gotten confused more than once on this issue dealing with other people's work. I'm fairly certain I have a grip on it these days, however. ;o> Yes, it may be a point of pride, but it's something players skip right over, and those who would be concerned of it? Well, you'd be covered so there's nothing to worry of. The coder's pell... - Anja ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 2:39 PM Subject: Is it still licenced...? > Exactly how 'changed' does a rom MUD have to be until someone doesn't > have to listen to the licence anymore? > > -- > ROM mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.rom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rom >
