http://www.suntimes.com/output/greeley/cst-edt-greel06.html

How long can Bush spin big lies into truth on Iraq war? 

May 6, 2005

BY ANDREW GREELEY 
 

As the criminal, sinful war in Iraq enters its third year, the 
president is in Europe to heal the wounds between the United States 
and its former allies, on his own terms, of course. The White House 
propaganda mill hails it as another victory for the president and 
ignores the fact that most Europeans still consider the war 
dangerous folly and the president a dangerous fool.



One hears new rationalizations for the war on this side of the 
Atlantic. After the hearings on Secretary Rice, a Republican 
senator, with all the self-righteous anger that characterizes many 
such, proclaimed, "The Democrats just have to understand that the 
president really believed there were weapons of mass destruction in 
Iraq."

This justification is not unlike the one heard frequently at the 
White House, "The president believed the intelligence agencies of 
the world."

Would it not be much better to have a president who deliberately 
lied to the people because he thought a war was essential than to 
have one who was so dumb as to be taken in by intelligence agencies, 
especially those who told him what he wanted to hear?

It is also asserted that the election settled the matters of the war 
and the torture of prisoners. These are dead issues that no longer 
need be addressed.

But the president received only 51 percent of the vote and carried 
only one more state than the last time (picking up New Mexico and 
Iowa and losing New Hampshire). This is a validation of the war and 
of prisoner abuse? This is a mandate to do whatever he wants to do 
and whatever the leadership of the evangelical denominations want? A 
percentage point and a single state are a mandate for more war? 
Never before in American political history!

Finally, we are told that the Iraqi election confirms the Bush 
administration policy in Iraq. The president's supporters must be in 
deep trouble to reach so far for that one. All the election proves 
is that the Iraqis want to run their own country. It also raises the 
possibility that Shia clerics will deliver Iraq into the hands of 
the Iranians. Some kind of victory!

How do these kinds of arguments play in the precincts? The survey 
data suggest that war has become more unpopular. The majority of the 
American people now think it was a mistake, in a shift away from the 
51 percent that endorsed it on Election Day. Admittedly this is only 
a small change in the population, from a majority to a minority. Nor 
do the changers earn grace for their new opinions. They still 
endorsed the war on Election Day and are still responsible for it.

How long can the administration get along with its policies of 
spinning big lies into truth -- as it has more recently done on 
Social Security?

Note the three most important Cabinet positions. Rice said that it 
was better to find the weapons of mass destruction than to see a 
mushroom cloud.

"Judge" Gonzales said the Geneva Convention was "quaint" and in 
effect legitimated the de facto policy of torture.

Rumsfeld repealed the "Powell Doctrine" -- only go to war when you 
have the massive force necessary to win decisively and quickly. 
Brilliant businessman that he is (like Robert McNamara of the 
Vietnam era), he thought he could win with 130,000 troops (unlike 
the at least 200,000 that the Army chief of staff insisted) and 
hence made the current "insurgency" inevitable.

The presence of these three towering giants in the administration 
certainly confirms that the president is confident that he 
is "right" on Iraq and that he has mandates from the American people 
and from God which confirm that he is "right."

Nothing, in other words, has changed in the last two years. The war 
is still the "right thing to do," it is still part of the "war 
against terrorism," it is still essential to keep Arabs from blowing 
up our skyscrapers.

You can still get away with the "big lie" as long as Karl Rove and 
his team of spinners keep providing persuasive rationalizations. The 
American public is still supine, uneasy about the war, but not 
willing yet to turn decisively against it. Will that still be the 
case next year when we "celebrate" the third anniversary of the war? 
Is the patience of the American people that long-suffering? Is there 
no outrage left in the country? How many people have to die before 
the public realizes that American foreign policy is a tissue of lies?









------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
DonorsChoose. A simple way to provide underprivileged children resources 
often lacking in public schools. Fund a student project in NYC/NC today!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/EHLuJD/.WnJAA/cUmLAA/RR.olB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

*** sustineti [romania_eu_list] prin 1% din impozitul pe 2005 -
detalii la http://www.europe.org.ro/euroatlantic_club/unulasuta.php ***

 



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/romania_eu_list/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Raspunde prin e-mail lui