> He's right, of course ... the StrBuf class, the template engine, the    
 >new readloop ... all of these improvements are conceptually nice, but    
 >the implementations all needed a lot more testing than they received.    
 
   
 Sounds like stuff that could have been covered with automated unit tests 
with relative ease. Note: automated unit testing virtually *dictates* that 
you write your software in an OO fashion, with (in C++ parlance) lots of 
virtual functions everywhere.  
 '  
  

Reply via email to