> Wed Sep 09 2009 20:02:41 CEST from LoanShark @ Uncensored > > >>He's right, of course ... the StrBuf class, the template engine, the >>new readloop ... all of these improvements are conceptually nice, but >>the implementations all needed a lot more testing than they received. >>
> > >Sounds like stuff that could have been covered with automated unit tests >with relative ease. Note: automated unit testing virtually *dictates* that >you write your software in an OO fashion, with (in C++ parlance) lots of >virtual functions everywhere. >' > > > > > > unit tests: yes. thats why I started them (a little late, last weekend) with http://cunit.sourceforge.net Its far from complete and I probably could use some help there. If you want to volunteer... Object oriented fassion: yes. it is. Virtual Functions: no need for that. C++: no need for that.
