Aleksey Bragin wrote: > Exactly what I was telling yesterday in IRC. I can only remember that you asked, if it would really fix something. ;) And yes it does. Just not the fully correct way.
> This assert is caused by recursive user call, not vice versa!! True. But the recursive usercall is valid. Please take a look at the article I linked. It should simply end at some point when no more kernel stack is available. > > Revert? What about the updated code I send? _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
