On May 18, 2009, at 6:43 PM, Timo Kreuzer wrote: > > Aleksey Bragin wrote: >> Exactly what I was telling yesterday in IRC. > I can only remember that you asked, if it would really fix > something. ;) > And yes it does. Just not the fully correct way. Ah yes, my bad!
>> This assert is caused by recursive user call, not vice versa!! > True. But the recursive usercall is valid. Please take a look at the > article I linked. It should simply end at some point when no more > kernel > stack is available. Yes, I mixed those two different bugs earlier too, hence the confusion, sorry. >> >> Revert? > What about the updated code I send? For me it looks correct, maybe Alex has comments. WBR, Aleksey Bragin. _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
