2005 is very commonly used. 2008 is quite poorly supported. I can definitely understand removing support for 2003 and older as those are very much deprecated. My company uses 2005 and I know that many others do as well.
Maya Zachary Gorden wrote: > Any reason to still keep 2005? > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Ged Murphy <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I’ve gone down the path of virtually rewriting the msvc backend for > rbuild. Our current implementation had completely outgrown its > original design and was becoming very difficult to manage, as > highlighted when I was adding support for VS 2010. > > > > Anyway, whilst I’m doing this I think it’s a good time assess what > we want to support. We currently support Visual Studio 6, Visual > Studio .NET 2002 and Visual Studio.NET 2003. This is a waste of time > IMO and only adds to the complexity of the module > > I’m proposing to remove support for these 3 products unless anyone > has any reasons against. > > > > Ged. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
