I use the codeblocks backend. Dev-C++ one can die a quick and painful death.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Ged Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > I’d imagine a lot of larger corporations still use 2005 as their > development environments are more tightly controlled. > > I didn’t want to alienate these users. > > > > Anyway, everything below msvc8 is now falling foul to my delete key. > > I’m going to do the same with the entire codeblocks and devcpp backends. > > Speak now or forever hold your peace. > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Zachary Gorden > *Sent:* 02 December 2009 15:23 > *To:* ReactOS Development List > *Subject:* Re: [ros-dev] rbuild msvc backend > > > > Any reason to still keep 2005? > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Ged Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > > I’ve gone down the path of virtually rewriting the msvc backend for rbuild. > Our current implementation had completely outgrown its original design and > was becoming very difficult to manage, as highlighted when I was adding > support for VS 2010. > > > > Anyway, whilst I’m doing this I think it’s a good time assess what we want > to support. We currently support Visual Studio 6, Visual Studio .NET 2002 > and Visual Studio.NET 2003. This is a waste of time IMO and only adds to the > complexity of the module > > I’m proposing to remove support for these 3 products unless anyone has any > reasons against. > > > > Ged. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
