Forcing people to use a new RosBE is a *good* thing. On 2009-12-31, at 12:15 AM, Daniel Reimer wrote:
> Good question. I wonder, too. Problem could be that this patch forces > ppl to use a new RosBE. At least last time i tried, it broke gcc 4.1.X > build. > > Alex Ionescu schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> As far as I am aware, GCC 4.4.x now works on Linux through RosBE 1.5 (minus >> some missing patches for 64-bit hosts), and I've gotten it to work on >> SnowLeopard with some minor hacks -- ie, all that's missing is for Colin, >> when he has time, to integrate the little fixes for these non-standard hosts. >> >> As for Windows, I think there is a fully working binary GCC 4.4.x/RosBE that >> builds trunk just fine. >> >> So what's missing for 4.4.x to become official, RosBE 1.5 to RTM, and for >> the 4.4.x patch from BZ to be committed (The one that gets trunk building)? >> >> Best regards, >> Alex Ionescu >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ros-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev Best regards, Alex Ionescu _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
