Sure it is. But explain this to the lazy bums out there :-P Nah, honestly, I dont think theres a real reason except the big step having to update gcc.
Alex Ionescu schrieb: > Forcing people to use a new RosBE is a *good* thing. > > On 2009-12-31, at 12:15 AM, Daniel Reimer wrote: > > >> Good question. I wonder, too. Problem could be that this patch forces >> ppl to use a new RosBE. At least last time i tried, it broke gcc 4.1.X >> build. >> >> Alex Ionescu schrieb: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> As far as I am aware, GCC 4.4.x now works on Linux through RosBE 1.5 (minus >>> some missing patches for 64-bit hosts), and I've gotten it to work on >>> SnowLeopard with some minor hacks -- ie, all that's missing is for Colin, >>> when he has time, to integrate the little fixes for these non-standard >>> hosts. >>> >>> As for Windows, I think there is a fully working binary GCC 4.4.x/RosBE >>> that builds trunk just fine. >>> >>> So what's missing for 4.4.x to become official, RosBE 1.5 to RTM, and for >>> the 4.4.x patch from BZ to be committed (The one that gets trunk building)? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Alex Ionescu >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ros-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ros-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >> > Best regards, > Alex Ionescu > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > > _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
