[email protected] wrote:
> LD is stupid and doesn't handle stdcall decoration as proper as
> dlltool does (after we provided a patch) [...]

Wouldn't it have been easier to just provide a similar patch for LD then? It was a matter of changing a strchr() call to strrchr()... (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9766)

We can always use a patched binutils version in the next RosBE if the patch is not applied to the upstream source in time.

Cheers,

Colin

_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

Reply via email to