Am 30.12.2010 12:21, Colin Finck wrote:
Wouldn't it have been easier to just provide a similar patch for LD
then? It was a matter of changing a strchr() call to strrchr()...
(http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9766)
I have attached a patch, but I was too lazy so far to compile and test it.
Index: pe-dll.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/ld/pe-dll.c,v
retrieving revision 1.133
diff -u -r1.133 pe-dll.c
--- pe-dll.c 27 Jun 2010 04:07:54 -0000 1.133
+++ pe-dll.c 29 Dec 2010 20:18:01 -0000
@@ -773,14 +773,16 @@
{
for (i = 0; i < NE; i++)
{
- if (strchr (pe_def_file->exports[i].name, '@'))
+ /* Check for stdcall/fastcall decoration, ignore C++ mangled names */
+ if (strchr (pe_def_file->exports[i].name, '@') &&
+ pe_def_file->exports[i].name[0] != '?')
{
/* This will preserve internal_name, which may have been
pointing to the same memory as name, or might not
have. */
int lead_at = (*pe_def_file->exports[i].name == '@');
char *tmp = xstrdup (pe_def_file->exports[i].name + lead_at);
- char *tmp_at = strchr (tmp, '@');
+ char *tmp_at = strrchr (tmp, '@');
if (tmp_at)
*tmp_at = 0;
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
