@Alex

http://www.reactos.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5652

First thing that needs to be fixed for Tools.

On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 23:38 +0100, "Alex Ionescu" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Aleksey,
> 
> Didn't you promise me 1.5 years ago that you'd make running VMWare Tools
> your #1 priority "as soon as the heap stuff is done"...?
> 
> Best regards,
> Alex Ionescu
> 
> 
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Aleksey Bragin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]
> > Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2011 10:50 PM
> > To: ReactOS Development List
> > Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [VMWINST]
> >
> >
> >  Since when vmware is the most common testing platform?:> I also agree, tha
> >> Vbox has taken up the first place...
> >>
> > I forgot to put on the ironic tag :) But seriously, it's one of the most
> > popular platforms. Vbox has really taken up the first place, I suppose.
> >
> >
> >  This module is not working properly, due to changes in Vmware 7 (and
> >> perhaps even earlier). Sure, you can hack around it, by providing the 
> >> driver
> >> manually... but its not what this module was supposed to do in the first
> >> place?
> >>
> >
> > The thing is, yes there is aproblem with autograbbing the modules, but if
> > you put them in proper place by yourself, it works flawlessly, and automates
> > their installation to the point when I just can choose the necessary
> > resolution and color depth at install time and everything else is done
> > within 5 seconds.
> >
> >
> >  What's worse, it is using some ugly methode of detecting Vmware host, by
> >> probing one specific pipe. On other hosts, this attempt throws an 
> >> exception.
> >> If we plan to run ROS tests with /FIRSTCHANCE this module needs to
> >> disappear.
> >>
> > This is not an ugly or a beautiful method, it is a method to detect
> > presence of a VMWare virtual machine described here:
> > http://kb.vmware.com/**selfservice/microsites/search.**
> > do?language=en_US&cmd=**displayKC&externalId=1009458<http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1009458>
> > It's also smartly wrapped into a VEH which would catch the exception on
> > other hardware (that's normal, nothing extraordinary).
> >
> > Rather, it's possible to hack away all possible first chance exceptions to
> > be able to run with /FIRSTCHANCE, but I doubt it's the right way. Are there
> > any other cases except vmwinst when an exception happens by design?
> >
> >
> >  In my opinion, VMWINST should either be fixed to deal with new Vmware, or
> >> be sent to its hard-earned retirement.
> >>
> > For me that would mean a substantial increase in a usual testing cycle
> > duration, because I would need to install VMWare Tools (do they even work?)
> > or cope with default ReactOS VESA driver (which sucks performance-wise
> > compared to fast VMWare's one).
> >
> > WBR,
> > Aleksey.
> >
> > ______________________________**_________________
> > Ros-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.reactos.org/**mailman/listinfo/ros-dev<http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev>
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev


-- 
With best regards
Caemyr

_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

Reply via email to