Internal affairs? What internal affairs? If this was about legal issues and thinks that definitely cannot be open to the public, I'd be okay with it. But this is an open-source project, no? Surely meetings should be public?
On 27 April 2012 11:38, Ged Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > It's just you, unless you can name a company that has their meetings in > public? > > Meetings are for the members of organizations set goals, deal with issues > and discuss behind the scenes information. > Why should non-members have the right to listen in on internal affairs? > > Ged. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Emanuel Rietveld > Sent: 27 April 2012 11:24 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Monthly meeting - April 2012 > > On 04/26/2012 07:38 PM, Pierre Schweitzer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This meeting will be private. If you do >> not have access, you will not be able to attend the meeting. >> >> Regards, >> > > Is it just me, or this a little like spraying contributor repellant on > your project? > > Kind Regards, > > Emanuel > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev -- Andrew Faulds (AJF) http://ajf.me/ _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
