Erm... does Firefox hold their meetings publicly? What about LibreOffice? On Fri, Apr 27, 2012, at 11:44 AM, Andrew Faulds wrote: > Internal affairs? What internal affairs? If this was about legal > issues and thinks that definitely cannot be open to the public, I'd be > okay with it. But this is an open-source project, no? Surely meetings > should be public? > > On 27 April 2012 11:38, Ged Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's just you, unless you can name a company that has their meetings in > > public? > > > > Meetings are for the members of organizations set goals, deal with issues > > and discuss behind the scenes information. > > Why should non-members have the right to listen in on internal affairs? > > > > Ged. -- With best regards Caemyr
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
