On 10/7/05 10:30 AM, Uwe Voelker wrote: > Allow the name of the relation too. For the pod example this would be > 'prices' because: Product---(prices)-->Price. (Unfortunately the Price > table is 'prices' too, so this is a bad example.) But by allowing this > the user could completely leave out the table name or the t2, t3 alias. > The same string is used by 'with_objects' and 'require_objects'. > [...] > Instead of table alias or table name also allow the above 'relation > name' (or the class name too - I'm not quite sure if this is allowed > now). If no prefix is given, use 't1' (main object), all other columns > need to be prefixed.
Both of these changes are in CVS now. I also altered the docs to suggest the use of the tN_foo column aliases as the ultimate disambiguation solution. -John ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
