On 11/28/05 1:52 PM, "John Siracusa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/28/05, Sean Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Ok. To be a bit more transparent, I have been working on a >> Catalyst::Model::RDBO (for my own use, anyway). I am simply modeling it on >> C::M::CDBI. It works fine, except that the arguments to RDBO::Loader come >> in two pieces, those for the loader object and those for the make_classes >> call. Because of the NEXT usage, there will need to be some parameter >> shifting in order for my current RDBO::Loader strategy to work as cleanly as >> the CDBI model. > > Okay, I suppose I can make those object attrs too and then let them be > overridden during the call to make_classes. I would say this is up to you. I have little desire to maintain a Catalyst::Model::RDBO, so if producing such a thing is useful for you, go for it. Otherwise, I can just hack things a bit to get it to work the way I would like. >> use base qw/Catalyst::Base Rose::DB::Object/; > > Ug, that makes me queasy :-/ Is there a reason this class has to be > derived from Rose::DB::Object? I don't see one... Uh, I guess not.... Sean ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
