Hello, > I just posted to the Catalyst list today mentioning that I'd like > someone to create a Catalyst::Model::RDBO. I'll do it myself > eventually. But either way, I'm willing to make this change to make > life easier for whoever ends up doing it.
I'm following the Cat mailing lists since the beginning. Really, the loader based models have caused more problems than they solved. I imagine a "plain" model, but this would be so simple that it's hardly worth an own distribution. My model looks like this: package MyApp::M::Rose; $VERSION = v0.1.0; use strict; use warnings; use base 'Catalyst::Base'; # load the real rdbo classes use My::RDBO::Table1; use My::RDBO::Table2; use My::RDBO::Table3; 1; Ok, one could go further and let all RDBO classes inherit form Catalyst::Base (or ::Model). This would give the possibility to use the comp() method (which calls ->new on the model class). But I don't need it. Bye, Uwe PS: Maybe a helper which uses RDBO's code generation would be of greater use than a loader based model. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
