On 1/24/06 10:39 AM, "John Siracusa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyway, like I said, baby steps. Start by implementing the Rose::DB
> public API in a new Rose::DB::Oracle module. While that's happening,
> it'd be great iif someone could post the various Oracle-isms discussed
> above to the list and I'll start considering what RDBO needs to do to
> support them.
I'm not an Oracle user and, like John, do not have access to it, but is
there precedent for someone who does have access to open a database for John
et al. for development purposes? This is probably a dumb idea and is laden
with security and political issues, but it might facilitate Oracle support.
I'm curious to know how dumb the idea is.
Sean
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
