On 14 Mar 2006, John Siracusa wrote:
> On 3/14/06 4:17 AM, Michael Lackhoff wrote:
> > Is it possible to either define a default sort_by clause in the
> > relationship definition
>
> See Uwe's earlier response for how to do this.
Yes, that works great. Thanks!
> > or when the relationship method is actually used
> > ($company->products({sort_by => 'name'}) or something
>
> That's not currently possible because a hashref argument to a relationship
> accessor method already has a meaning:
At the moment I can do without it because I only need one sort order.
> # Set this company's list of products to
> # products 123 and 456
> $company->products({ id => 123 }, { id => 456 });
>
> # Set this company's vendor to Acme
> $company->vendor({ name => 'Acme' });
>
> Can you think of a good way to pass custom manager_args to individual calls
> to a relationship accessor? Maybe a new read-only accessor type where
> arguments can't possible be meant to set values?
Yes, perhaps, or a second hashref with meta-args.
When I was looking for a solution I always thought: "It must be
something like the manager method get_products() and that is read-
only.
But on the other hand perhaps it is better to leave it until you see
a really good solution.
Cheers,
Michael
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
