On 7/28/06 1:55 PM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote: > if i load something with a with_objects, and get a structure like this:
A what now? Data structure? These are objects! No poking around as if they were mere hashes! :) Methods are the approved way to modify the tree of objects. Fiddling around with the undocumented internals will only lead to tears. What are you trying to do? > also, does anyone have a clue how I can push the caller into the > object metadata? i'm just screwing around, and I 'think' that i'd > like to track how objects were loaded (ie: load; or the name of a > manager class sub ) You could add some tracking of the caller in an overridden version of the new() or init() methods, calling caller(...) and saving the information somewhere in the object. -John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
