On 8/2/06 3:38 AM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> as-is though, rose is a bit odd -- you can't really loop the same
> object 2x in code if there's a delete
Well, you can always splice the list yourself, which has the advantage of
being more explicit and clear to a reader:
my $bars = $foo->bars; # reference to actual list
my $i = 0;
while(my $obj = $bars->[$i])
{
if(...)
{
$obj->delete;
splice(@$bars, $i, 1);
next;
}
$i++;
}
OTOH, I can see how some people might expect this to automagically delete
the object from the list:
foreach my $obj ($foo->bars)
{
$obj->delete if(...);
}
I'll think about it.
> how about including a null hash/array for with_object relationships
> that don't match? i find myself testing for these things a lot. am
> i the only one who keep running into this?
I think that's a bad idea. If you're doing a lot of queries with_objects
where those objects may or may not be there, I want them to really not be
there when they're not there :) To make the tests easier, perhaps a
has_related() Helper method?
if($obj->has_related('bars')) { ... }
-John
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
