On Dec 9, 2006, at 5:28 PM, Danial Pearce wrote: > As John says somewhere in the documentation. If you are putting > triggers on your DB, why wouldn't you put them in your object as well? > Your object is supposed to know pretty much everything about your DB, > so why would you lie to it and tell it you aren't using any triggers? > Don't lie, it makes baby jesus cry.
you wouldn't, and shouldn't. from the original posting, it read as if the author was not using triggers at all in his db. he said that the columns were functions of a number -- to me, that suggests 'variations' -- not that the column values were inserted by a trigger using functions. i'm a big fan of as-much-in-the-db-as-possible. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
