Just wondering if there is a time line for some of these Oracle changes to be implemented? The sequence addition would be very nice to have. I have a kludge right now where I override the save function.
Thanks, Kevin -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Siracusa Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 5:20 PM To: Rose::DB::Object list Subject: Re: [RDBO] Oracle progress On 12/6/06, Ted Zlatanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would be OK with an abort from RDBO if I use 'serial' without the > right sequence setup. But RDBO should allow an override of the > '%s_seq' name. No worries. It already does. -John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
