> So, does this method type seem useful?  If so, what do you think of
> the method type name ("find") and the default method name format
> ("find_<relationship-name>")?

Ruby uses find. If it's good enough for ruby, it's good enough for me :-)

I agree that it seems obvious the results won't be cached.

What happens when you call ->find_prices with no args?

"When I was a kid I used to pray every night for a new bike. Then I
realised that the Lord doesn't work that way so I stole one and asked
him to forgive me."

Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
Rose-db-object mailing list

Reply via email to