> So, does this method type seem useful? If so, what do you think of
> the method type name ("find") and the default method name format
> ("find_<relationship-name>")?
Ruby uses find. If it's good enough for ruby, it's good enough for me :-)
I agree that it seems obvious the results won't be cached.
What happens when you call ->find_prices with no args?
regards,
Danial
--
"When I was a kid I used to pray every night for a new bike. Then I
realised that the Lord doesn't work that way so I stole one and asked
him to forgive me."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
