On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 10:54:36PM -0400, John Siracusa wrote:
> > What about using Ima::DBI? Would that stomp on RDB?
>
> I doubt it. A Rose::DB object shouldn't care much what class its dbh is, so
> long as it acts appropriately like a plain DBI dbh.
Sorry, just getting back to this.
I'm missing something critical -- or something obvious:
This works fine in my base class:
sub init_db { our $DBH =|| App::RDB->new }
I've got the same $dbh for the life of the program.
But, I'd like to try using DBI->connect_cached directly.
I first tried returning $dbh directly in the init_db call. That's
were I misunderstood your comments, I guess.
So, then I tried passing a "dbh" param to App::RDB->new:
sub init_db {
...
my $dbh = DBI->connect_cached( @params );
return App::RDB->new( dbh => $dbh );
}
Where @params does not change between calls. I then get a new $dbh.
for new RDBO objects.
So, I'm not seeing how to correctly do this.
Thanks,
--
Bill Moseley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
