I'll dig around for it, I guess I missed it if it came through the list earlier.
On 5/1/07, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/1/07, Derek Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I feel like I'm repeating work here -- I've got a similar set of > > functions that serialize and restore trees of objects, only I'm doing > > this in a very specific way, keeping only what I want from specific > > classes (not reusable). > > > > What are the chances of this object_tree code making it into 0.764 or > > even 0.765? Would you care to share your code in advance? I would > > surely use it. > > It won't be in 0.764. It's too young and I want to wring it out a bit > first. For 0.765, if it has tests and docs and we're all happy with > the API and behavior, sure. As for sharing the code, didn't Jonathan > post it earlier? > > -John > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > Rose-db-object mailing list > Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
