On Feb 7, 2008 9:40 AM, Kevin McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've actually been working on a Cached::FastMmap module for my own project
> a
> My::DB::Object::Cached::FastMmap type module. I wanted to test using
> FastMmap because I want my application to use the same cache across
> different processes. So far it's been a success and I've now been working
> on trying to make it more generic.
>
> I'd be willing to help with coming up with a module that does this, I
> would
> definitely have an interest for it.
>
Instead of using Cache::FastMmap directly, how about using CHI:
http://search.cpan.org/~jswartz/CHI/
That would let you experiment with different backends without changing your
code. I haven't tried it yet but I've heard good things.
-sam
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
