Thanks for the reference to the site. It solved some other issues as well.
Eric Manley wrote:
> Sven,
>
> Yes, you are right in that the get/set operations would not be in your
> report due to those being done via code generation. I believe there are
> scripts out there (check the unofficial Rose Web site,
> http://www.rationalrose.com ) that will add accessor/mutator operations for
> specific operations (based on stereotype). If there isn't one out there,
> these are pretty easy to write, and can save you time in the end.
>
> Something that we've had limited success on, is taking that code,
> (post-generation), and reverse-engineering it back into the model (Java). I
> say limited, as there are a few quirks with this, and you have to do a bit
> of clean up. It depends on how important it is, to get it in the model for
> your documentation.
>
> Eric
>
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
