Hi
> Rational tells to use "Unidirectional Association" with stereo type as
> <<includes>> or <<extends>> between usecases.
> But as per Booch this is a "dependency". I also agree with
> Booch because if
> there is a change in the included usecase the main usecase is
> bound to get
> affected.
> But why still Rational recommends the use of Unidirectional
> Association??
This has not been necessary since Rose200e (May 2000) - you can and should
now use the proper dependency arrow with the right stereotype (<<include>>
and <<extend>>)
regards
anthony
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
